Tuesday, January 08, 2008

The Obama Dilemma: Do I vote Race or Family Values?



Commentary By Wanda


With the Presidential primaries in full speed, and Barack Obama one of the leading Democratic candidates it seems timely and appropriate to consider the possibility of a black president. Just the other day I was having coffee with a friend and he asked me what I thought about Barack Obama. Although I will have to leave out the extremities of my response I basically told him I was not sure America was ready for a man with mixed racial background to be President nor do I think we're ready for a woman (Not long after our discussion, Ambassador Andrew Young confirmed my view about Obama.) Now as I am writing this commentary I think that I might have been wrong. Clearly, change is never welcomed. If MLK would have waited until the right time we might have never been able to pass legislation against racial discrimination; if Susan B. Anthony, Harriet Tubman, or Sojourner Truth would have waited, many of us who have historically been discriminated against would still live in that reality. I am in no way asserting that many are not still the victims of discrimination, but, thanks to the efforts of those named above, in less overt ways. Blacks and women have been programmed to “wait” whether to serve or to prolong action. I am not naïve enough to think that action will inevitably create an instant change. However, inaction has never accomplished much either. I don’t struggle with politics and race very often but I do feel the tension between race and gender. It’s a slippery slope and many times the greater (race) calls on me to place the lesser (gender) on the back burner. It will be curious to see how many of us who have voted conservative now negotiate the tension between race and politics.

Now this leads me to my second point. Voting Family Values. I don’t understand what that really means since values were enforced by my parents and government was to be viewed, according to my parents, as having control over broader, social issues. But nevertheless, many blacks who have voted for “family values” candidates in the past will face -The Obama Dilemma. Many of these same individuals who were shouting from the rooftops about family values have expressed their support of Obama. News alert! Obama is pro-choice, pro-civil unions, pro-stem cell research among other liberal political positions (We shouldn't forget the gospel concert controversy with Donnie McClurkin.)So Black Conservative Christian…how will you vote? Are you Christian first or Black first? (If you want to read an interesting book on this topic read Finding Soul Brothers: Dismantling Black Christian Racialism by Pamela G. Wilson.) Now, I am not saying that there is anything wrong with their decision; they have a right to vote for any candidate of their choosing. But has race trumped your convictions? Or do you see the importance of electing a man who can empathize with the plight of the “other” and wants to see change for himself and future generations.

Finally, it should be interesting to see who our beloved mega-pastors endorse if Obama makes it as the democratic candidate. (Hummm, but many of these pastors will be avoiding the IRS so we may not hear much from them this election season.) Nevertheless, I think that this miry muck will bring to light the tension between politics and race. My voting decision has yet to be finalized and I am in no way stating my full support of Obama, Clinton, or anyone else for that matter. Voting exclusively based on race, gender or family values is equally dangerous but somehow I feel that it will characterize the voting decisions of many this election.

Commentary by Cantice

Well it has been a long time. Wanda didn't let you faithful readers down in her posting of a lengthy, gutsy, rather disclosing commentary about making tough voting decisions. When Wanda mentioned that she was going to write about Obama, he was the furthest thing from my mind. My not thinking about Barack Obama in several months has a different impact today as I try to muster up an appropriate response to Wanda's critical statements. One way to begin to connect with this topic is to tell you what presidential thoughts I have had.

Most of my political thoughts have been at least in part prompted by my husband's faithful attention to media surrounding the presidential race. Most recently, he's (we've) been interested in Huckabee's rise to popularity. Internally, I've struggled with whether I prefer someone like Huckabee or Guiliani. The merits of Huckabee that attract me are his overt Christian worldview, including his position on abortion, and his more realistic ideas about immigration. Conversely, I am attracted to Guiliani's economic outlook including school choice programs. As I've said to my husband, we'll always have pastors to champion our moral beliefs and guide us in doing our part to color our communities with that theistic, Christian outlook. But when I think about our country's economic troubles, which for me do not concern an increase in minimum wage, but focus on the depreciating dollar and an expanding trade deficit and national debt, I wonder if an agenda that places moral or social change at the top of its list is the best for this country. A failed economy will produce equality; we'll all be destitute. Lack of freedom to determine a standard of living by the educational, occupational, and networking choices one makes will be widespread. I don't want that kind of equality. That kind of equality was imposed by communism and caused the despair felt by Russian citizens and many others.

But back to Obama. In short, I don't feel a tug to consider voting in his favor. At least I don't now. I do remember a faint sadness I felt when I first learned of his popularity and decision to run for president. I was saddened that we sit on opposite sides of the political table (it would take me too long to tell why the Republican platform more closely matches my idea of national government, than that of Democrats, Libertarians or The Green Party). The GOP is certainly not my picture of the perfect party, but when I boil it all down, it is the party that supports more of my ideas about what government should do. My hope is that more people from my ancestry (black Americans) would embrace those ideas. I hope that one day I will be able to vote for a black president for no other reason than that I believe that he or she will be the best candidate for the job. In that way I will simultaneously combat my own prejudices while also doing what I believe is best for my country.

2 comments:

mrjwhit~ said...

Great posts. I'll add my 2 cents soon.

Anonymous said...

It's a great debate and one that we insue in the coming days. Huckubee is a white candidate and if we continue to refer to Obama as a black candidate then they both should be described by their color. Whites have been voting for whites for years and it was never an issue. Why? Because they have "learned to be white in America" and they often live in shame as Thandeka as written in "Learning to Be White." White candidates have had moral failings throughout the years and our cuurent president has lied repeatedly to the American people about the war he waged against Iraq. The GOP's way of doing business does not deal with justice issues and it is no moral compass for Americans. Neither one of the parties represent fully the people, but the people in the class that they belong. We have a religion about Jesus, not the religion of Jesus.